User:Vferreiraa12/Blue jellyfish/Tomslocumb1 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Vferreiraa12


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Vferreiraa12/Blue_jellyfish?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Blue jellyfish
 * Blue jellyfish

Evaluate the drafted changes
The information included in your draft is definitely a valid addition to what is already in the original article, and I think each of the pieces of info could carry you into different body paragraphs/sections. However, I think that you'd also benefit from making the sentences a little bit meatier; they communicate facts, but they do not communicate the kind of detail that would lead into a section of explorable and citable material. For example, expanding upon what sort of plankton they eat, how this affects the environment, if they are invasive anywhere/affected by the invasion of another species/how this relates to trophic levels, etc. The additions are a good start and they are correctly cited and well formatted and worded, but I think overall, maybe not fleshed out enough. I think the image included is a great visual, and may also benefit from another graphic alongside it maybe that is not a beautiful photo, but a labeled anatomical depiction of the jelly. Additionally, I think the article would benefit a lot from you focusing on the taxonomy part, which is very bare on the original, and is information that we have explored in class, so it would be cool to see how much of it you could make relevant to the page.