User:Vgedwards82!/sandbox

Population
Duchenne muscular dystrophy affects all males of different ethnicity. 'Birth prevalence of DMD has been estimated at 1 in 3,500 (2.9 per 10,000) male births " The population of those affected with Duchenne muscular dystrophy worldwide varies. Research from a 1987 survey shows that when comparing  the impact of enzyme levels that maybe affect DMD between those from Caucasian, African, and Asian descents ; there showed no significance in clinical and a slight difference in enzyme between African American and Asian descent. In a 1992 study, Research revealed showing differences between Indian, Pakistan, and Afro Caribbean w living in the Midland England region and the frequency of those with DMD. It was revealed that there is a larger number of men of Indian descent who have the disease than compared to Pakistanis; the possible reason for the higher increase is a continuous factors in the Wild-Type that can lead to a mutation.  Research in 2010, showed a higher amount of  those with DMB age ranging from five to fifty four who are Hispanic compared to Non-Hispanic Whites, and Non-Hispanic Blacks. When comparing the mortality rates of those with DMD from males under forty. A sample from individuals from Columbia, South Carolina were studied from 2006-2015. There were significance higher annual death rates of whites than whites, blacks. American Indian/Alaska Natives, and Asian/Pacific. It was also shown that there was a higher significance in Non-Hispanic Whites in Hispanic Whites, Hispanic black, and non-Hispanic blacks.

Article evaluation
Things to consider:


 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
 * What else could be improved?
 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
 * Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference?
 * Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias note

Now take a look at how others are talking about this article on the talk page

 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback with four tildes — ~