User:Vgs0208/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Animal rights movement

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article to evaluate because this is a topic I am very interested! Once I clicked on the article, I noticed it was well organized and had other links linked to it.

Evaluate the article
Lead Section: I think the lead section can use slight changes to make it sound better. Although it gave a good description on what the animals rights movement was, it didn't really give us information as to what sections will be included and talked about.

Content: The articles content is relevant to the articles and I would day it is pretty up to date since the last edit made was last year(2022) in August. I would say the information provided is good in this article!

Tone and Balance: The article is about animals right movement which is a movement against animal cruelty, so it does go on a side where they mention we should stop animal cruelty. It doesn't seem bias or seem to persuade one to take a side.

Sources and References: The facts mentioned in the article are backed up by second articles to support their information. I clicked on a lot o sources linked and most of them are either from last year or this year! History individuals are mentioned when necessary. This article might be able to use other options of articles, but overall the sources they used were also really good and relevant.

Organization and writing Quality: The organization of this article is neat and easy to mange. The writing quality is also easy to read and follow. They made sure to use punctuation when needed and spelling is good!

Images and Media: All pictures used in the article enhance an understanding of the topic. All the images are well captioned and adhere to the copyright regulations.

Talk-Page discussion: Someone asked why there was a whole section dedicated to ritual slaughter if its a small and insignificant campaign in the history of animal rights. This comment was made in 2006 and there was no response. The article has interest of wikiprojects.

Overall Impressions: The overall status of the article is that it is an okay/good article. The strength was being provided by information and links to sources that are from last year or this year. The images helped as well and the organization and grammar of the article. After reading the comment on the talk page, they can reduce theyre section where it talks about small events in the history of animal rights. I think this is a well-developed article