User:Vicccshi/Xu Jinglei/Esther Zhao210 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Vicccshi


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Vicccshi/Xu_Jinglei?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Xu Jinglei

Evaluate the drafted changes

 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
 * - Yes, everything in this article is about Xu Jinglei.
 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * - The article is pretty neutral, showing only the background information and concrete evidences of Xu Jinglei's acheivements.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * - I think in the lead part, the awards earned by Xu JInglei focused too much on her acting career with only the significant actress awards earned by her. I would recommend you to rather remove the mentioning of awards or make the quotation a more comprehensive one. The leading part could include some of her prominent directing award so that it won't be underrepresented.
 * Check the citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
 * - Yes, all citations work. And I really appreciate your clarification of other activities joined by Xu Jinglei and the links inserted in the article. The links lead readers into further understanding those Chinese shows and would give them a better sense of the media culture background surrounded Xu Jinglei and her role in Chinese media.
 * Is each fact supported by an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
 * - Information came from Chinese official websites which are prettybreliable. Some of the informaiton are cited from Xu Jinglei's personal blogs and media platforms which might be a little biased, but could provide readers a deep understanding of her personality and leave more space for them to think.
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that should be added?
 * - Information are categorized into her past experiences and current achievements. Maybe it would be better for you to research more about her future plans in the film industry. Information could be updated from resources indicating her coming up plans.