User:Victoriawesloh/Jennifer White Johnson/Jpark111 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Victoria Wesloh's Jennifer White-Johnson


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Victoriawesloh/Jennifer_White_Johnson?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes

 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
 * I am unfamiliar with the format the exhibitions are in- I haven't seen a wikipedia article where the title of the exhibition is bolidified and italicized. I understand that the title of exhibitions are formatively supposed to be italicized, but I am curious as to whether the title of the exhibitions should be in bold and as sub titles under categories. (usually, I see them in a regular paragraph format, but I could just be unaware of these formats). There also seems to be a couple of run-on sentences.
 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * All details seem neutral.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * All viewpoints seem to be fairly and equally represented.
 * Check the citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
 * Only one link seems to be hyperlinked in the bibliography.
 * Is each fact supported by an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
 * Yes, everything is supported by appropriate, reliable references. Are zines neutral?
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that should be added?
 * all information is very recent.