User:Vielka.g/Dianna Ortiz/Starshinednights Peer Review

The additions to 'Early Life and Education' are well articulated and have sufficient amount of citations. Under 'Abduction and Torture' I would recommend adding why the friend she met in psychiatric care would be important. This explanation would have to be a quote or paraphrase as to not sounds biased. In the 'U.S. and Guatemala' section, I would suggest adding another citation to the second paragraph. The language under 'Hunger Strike' seems a tad biased when talking about Hillary Clinton. I think you should add another citation in the 'Human Rights Work' section. The language in the new section of 'Guatemala's Civil War' seems to be biased. Overall, the additions you and your team have made are very informational and greatly add to the quality of the previously existing article, great job, there are just a few minor things to alter!

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)