User:VincentH81/Revolution OS/KhajadaNeal Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? VincentH81
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: Revolution OS

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? No updates haven’t been started yet.
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes it discusses the main points of the film.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Yes the lead describes what’s in the section.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No all information is in the article.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? The lead gives just enough information to lead into the content.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? All content is relevant to the topic.
 * Is the content added up-to-date? It hasn’t been updated since February.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? All the content in the article is fine.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? Yes all content is neutral.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No claims seem to be biased.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? The view points are just fine.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No the content doesn’t exam

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes all content is backed up.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes they reflect the literature but there might be more.
 * Are the sources current? Yes half of the sources are current.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes half of the sources work and the other half don’t.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes the content is clear and easy to read.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? The content didn’t have any errors.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes the topic is broken down into sections.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? There are no images.
 * Are images well-captioned? There are no images.
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? There are no images.
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? There are no images.

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject? Yes the article has at least 4 secondary sources.
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject? The list isn’t exhaustive. I  believe more literature could be found.
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles? Yes the article follows the pattern of other articles.
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable? The article has a couple of links to other articles.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? The article is almost complete.
 * What are the strengths of the content added? The information provided was good about the topic.
 * How can the content added be improved? Finding more information on the film or poplin the film.