User:Vipul/Inside American Education

Inside American Education: The Decline, The Deception, The Dogmas is a book by economist and social theorist Thomas Sowell (hardcover 1992, paperback 2003, Kindle Edition 2010) that details Sowell's assessment of the state of education in the United States (both K-12 education and higher education).

Criticism of educational "fads"
Sowell was critical of a number of educational programs and paradigms that became popular in the United States in the 1960s onward. Among the programs that he critiqued in his book and other writings were:


 *  A Course of Study: Sowell called the curriculum a controversial curriculum and was critical both of the curriculum and the stealth with which it was introduced (Page 252).
 * Values clarification: Sowell was critical of "values clarification" programs and wrote (in his book as well as in later online pieces) that:

"The very phrase 'values clarification' is fundamentally dishonest. When parents tell their children not to steal or not to have sex, there is no ambiguity as to what they mean. Clarification is neither required nor attempted. Instead, values are downgraded to subjective preferences of individuals or blind traditions of 'our society,' and contrasted with alternative values of other individuals and other societies -- including, in some cases, the societies of various species of animals.[152] The 'nonjudgmental' approach which pervades such exercises provides no principle of logic or morality by which to choose among the many alternatives presented -- except, implicitly, what 'peers' or 'experts' or 'modern thinking' might prefer. 'Clarification' is merely a process used to camouflage this process of undermining the child's existing values. (Page 65)"

Sowell has elaborated on his arguments against values clarification on online articles.
 * Other educational programs including sex education, drug education, and affective education. Sowell claimed that the programs often strayed from their stated goals and engaged in generic brainwashing of people intended to indoctrinate them and turn them against their parents. In addition, Sowell claimed that many programs labeled as gifted and talented programs also ended up being courses in indoctrination. Sowell named educational theorist Carl Rogers as an important influence on these programs.
 * Sowell argued against peace education and nuclear education programs on similar grounds.
 * Sowell was also critical of bilingual education and cited studies showing that many parents were opposed to such education.

Criticism of low skill level of school teachers
Sowell was critical of schools of education for training the future teachers in educational fads and having low overall standards, and was critical of states requiring people to have credentials from schools of education to take teaching jobs.

Criticism of ideological double standards at colleges
Sowell argued that higher educational institutions were full of double standards, including standards that excused violence and disruption when carried out in the name of politically correct goals, but were extremely harsh on small infractions that might be perceived to oppose politically correct goals.

Criticism of poor college teaching
Sowell argued that, unlike school teaching, the average quality of college teaching was better. He identified a few problems:


 * Wide variation in teaching standards between instructors at the same institution, with fairly poor instruction at the lower end.
 * Instructors in ideologically driven courses offering easy grades and lax grading standards in order to attract students.
 * Political indoctrination in courses, including indoctrination in topics unrelated to the alleged subject of study.

Reception
The book was reviewed by Patrick Groff in The Freeman, the journal of the Foundation for Economic Education. Groff was critical of Sowell for failing to be as radical in his proposals for reform as he was forthright in his criticism of the status quo.

Jon Sanders reviewed the book favorably for the Pope Center in August 1997.

The book was also reviewed by W. Brewster Gillett and others. The book also received a number of reviews on GoodReads.