User:Visionimpact/Samuel louis dael

The writings of Samuel Louis Dael are based upon pre-classical concepts. According to Mr. Dael, the maturation of this view comes from coherent thoughts that consider Godly intelligence a coexistent. This higher intelligence would most naturally reveal itself in an epistemological form of consistent meaning. It would follow that intelligence is not a byproduct of physically known particles such as electrons and protons and could not evolve from an entropic universe that decays. Intelligence must of necessity evolve of its own—something we attribute to biology, but should only apply to intelligence. The physical universe is entropic while the intelligent universe must be anti-entropic in order to procure a Godly understanding. In this sense, evolution can only apply to that which does not decay. Survival is not a biological process. It is rather found in the intelligent apparatus that drives each of us. If we can come to grips with this orientation, then we can better understand that psychology is not the understanding of the behavior of elements, but is how we react to the nature of our various experiences during our infinite evolutionary process. Mr. Dael does not attempt to prove any form of reincarnation. Intelligence is not simply memory ability that we might recall experience. It is an eternal evolutionary capacity to understand.

The problem with understanding is that survival often becomes contradictory and it is imperative that we constantly evaluate the meaning of our choices. Life is a trauma. It is apt to conjure up false assumptions of denial. In this view, intelligence is often sickened by its own lies. The greater the intelligence and its ability to catalog information the more apt it will become insane unless it nurtures a clear and un-contradictory epistemology of understanding. The intelligence of man did not evolve from the lower forms. The intelligence of the first man was very high by comparison. You can look at the technology of the ancient Egyptians and note that much was lost and only by persuasion of the Greek philosophers could they obtain some of the secrets of the ancient Chaldeans. Pythagoras had to be circumcised before he could enter into the secret forums and be taught of these mysteries. The fall of Egypt produced a great deal of mythical darkness, but a few of the priests held the secrets tightly. Columbus learned of this ancient knowledge through specific Greek writing and the 365.25 year cycle from the ancient Egypt that proved that the world was round.

Most of these concepts are found in Mr. Dael’s unpublished work The Christian Folly. It will not be available until 2012 due to its religious sensitivity. The Platonic Idiom was Mr Dael’s first publication and illustrates some of these pre-classical concepts. He illustrates the proper order of ancient epistemology and how it was perhaps used to discipline the intelligent mind. Dael suggests that the Socratic Method was of this ancient school, but indicated that Plato used it to thwart truth by forming a grotesque infirmity of western civilization. Social justice is the residue of this false Platonic view. Plato was a student of Socrates and used him as the lead character in all of his dialogues. Not once was Plato in the dialogue. This is indicative of Plato using the name of Socrates to promote his form of forced justice. In Hebrew literature this was Satanic. The mind of Socrates, who gave his life for the right to teach truth would not rationally foster the philosophy illustrated in Plato’s Republic. Plato was not unlike a puritanical preacher using Christ to justify a strange doctrine. The student of every master tends to turn the original upside-down. After the death of a master it is the nature of one to capitalize on his name and claim a method by flatteries in order to change the doctrine or espouse his own. Plato was no exception.

The Platonic Idiom illustrates this pre-classical epistemology. Dael uses a mathematical sum, Pythagorean-like method in order to define words free of contradiction. It is not unlike the ancient Hebrew Tree of Life or [|Sephirot]. Dael starts with the number one and attempts to assign a meaning much in the same way Pythagoras assigned perfection to the number ten. This he learned from the Egyptian priests. Using scriptural text in conjunction with numbers and their sums, the conclusion became obvious that equality was the term for one. “One flesh” in Genesis really meant equal in material things. Scripture hides the correct meaning in order to avoid contamination of decay due to the insanity and denial concocted by human intelligence. Flesh would mean material things. Every word does not have a number, but must be derived from ten basic epistemological terms and their respective reality. Material things are derived from creation, a Hebrew term often used in defining objective existence. Dael assigns the number seven to creation, not only because of biblical associations but because existence has six basic particularizing terms that build up to the meaning of creation and therefore nails its meaning. Creation itself particularizes the next term above. It is conveniently called infinity with its associate number eight. Intelligence or the number nine must have the ability to relate all eight epistemological terms in order to maintain sanity and the absence of denial. When it fails to do so, the more intelligent begin to twist reality around by changing the meaning of the ten basic terms or the reality in which they are derived. Mental illness is really a change of one’s epistemology or reality. History has born this out during the Dark Ages as humanity fell into a pit of darkness by completely distorting the original meaning of Christianity in much the same way that Plato distorted the Socratic Method. The problem is essentially a psychological one for failure to maintain a sound epistemology of meaning. As simple men began to read scripture and other writings reserved only for the master priest, did we again climb to a level of enlightenment? These fresh minds defined things clearly without contradiction. The sick mind had all sorts for dark mystical strangeness decayed to a level of darkness. Proper discussion is at the root of knowledge and cannot be found in so-called authoritative works. Epistemological discussion comes from the sage, poet, philosopher, wise cleric and not from traditionally interpreted text. The wise come from the belly of experience and not necessarily the quotations of so-called masters of new thought. We had it right in the beginning.

Samuel Louis Dael has applied this method throughout his life and has been moved to correct the epistemology of philosophy, physics, psychology, economics and even politics. The second book recently published in 2010 was The Einstein Illusion. It was written to correct the myths about relativity. It seems that science prefers the subject of strangeness and paradox more than consistent epistemological meaning. When it was realized that space is subjective, time predicative and mass objective, it became apparent that energy (one of the many verbs of physics) could not be converted into mass nor could mass be converted into energy. It became apparent that light is not energy other than in its motion. It is more appropriate to call it particles of mass. We had the truth back in Faraday’s day, but it become more important to deny the materiality of the electric and magnetic field. This was achieved by fabricating a physical ether presumed to be ridged when it was none other than a variably dense magnetic field. Putting things into the proper reality made it possible to smooth out the dark paradoxes of relativity where the denial God is now manifest in the big bang cosmology.

No matter where one looks, darkness prevails. Modern physics, evolution, psychology and economics must return to the pre-classical origins.