User:VivBiol343/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Tracheid
 * Article Evaluation: The content does not read smoothly (grammar is sometimes off) and it is quite unclear in many places. There is only one citation in the entire text and that was to cite the origin of the name "Tracheid." All other information is uncited. Since this is the only citation, there are missing citations for the rest of the information which is not ideal. There is nothing on the talk page. Lots of room for improvement here.
 * Sources
 * https://www.jstor.org/stable/4123132
 * https://www.jstor.org/stable/newphytologist.203.4.1231
 * https://www.jstor.org/stable/4123132
 * https://www.jstor.org/stable/newphytologist.203.4.1231

Option 2

 * Flower induction
 * Article Evaluation: There is very little information on this page, but it makes sense and is concise. There is only one citation for this article, but it seems to be academically reliable. There is a question on the talk page asking if floral induction is the same thing. I think this article is off to a good start but it can be expanded on by a lot.
 * Sources
 * https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12340
 * https://doi.org/10.1007/s11103-018-0801-2
 * https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12340
 * https://doi.org/10.1007/s11103-018-0801-2

Option 3

 * Elicitor
 * Article Evaluation: I think the lead section is good and informative. However, I think the next section of Effectors and Hormones is unnecessary or unclear because they describe what plant effectors and hormones are, but how they are related is not described. The next section on crop protection and commercialization of elicitors is more relevant and I think it can be expanded on by a lot, as it's quite short right now. The article has 5 citations but many of them are used in the section on effectors and hormones, where its relevance to the article is unclear.
 * Sources
 * https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2005.01.003
 * https://www.jstor.org/stable/26389822
 * https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2005.01.003
 * https://www.jstor.org/stable/26389822

+More sources will be found...