User:Vkottapiu/Portillo's Restaurants/Blazoff Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Vkottapiu
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: Vkottapiu's draft

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?

The lead has been updated to reflect the content added my my peer.


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?

The article does provide an introductory sentence tin the lead that concisely describes the topic of the article.


 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?

The article does provide brief descriptions of the article's major sections.


 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?

No, the lead does not include information not present in the article.


 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

The lead is very concise.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?

The content added is definitely relevant to the topic, as it describes one of the restaurant's locations.


 * Is the content added up-to-date?

The content added is up-to-date, as it was added in 2019.


 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?

I do no see any content that is clearly missing or that is irrelevant to the article.


 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?

I don't believe the article deals with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps, as it does not address underrepresented populations of topics.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?

Yes, the content added is informational.


 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?

There are not claims that appear heavily biased in nature. The article is very neutral in nature.


 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?

The viewpoints represented in the article are neutral and objective.


 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

No, as stated before, the article is very objective.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?

The additional content is backed up a primary source, not a secondary source. However, given the informative nature of content, I don't see any conflicts arising from the use of the source.


 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?

The sources are as thorough as they need to be, given they just of a new restaurant location.


 * Are the sources current?

The sources are current. The oldest known source is from 2006.


 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?

The sources appear to be from different authors, except those that describe the locations of the restaurants.


 * Check a few links. Do they work?

The second source listed actually doesn't appear to work. It takes me to a website but to a blacked-out page with no information. All other links I checked appear to work correctly.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?

Yes, the content added is written in accordance to other similar entries to this article. It is very easy to read.


 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?

No clear grammatical or spelling errors stick out to me.


 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Yes, but there is very little content added - just a single location of a new Portillo's restaurant that wasn't added before.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?

The article includes images of the restaurant logo and a Chicago-style hot dog. I would argue these do enhance the comprehension of the topic.


 * Are images well-captioned?

Yes.


 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?

No. The Portillo's logo is used is a manner that may be against Wikipedia's copyright regulations.


 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

They are fairly basically laid out, but they are easy-to-follow and acceptable in my opinion.

Overall evaluation
I feel as if this article is definitely very informative, adhering to Wikipedia's standards. Its wording is also very clear, concise, and appears to show no bias. The only concern I have is the additions made by Vkottapiu, as they have only added a single line where a new location is mentioned (that I am aware of).