User:Vladams/sandbox

Wikipedia Evaluation

Botany: This page is really well done. There is a lot of information available and it is displayed in a neutral manner. The information is pretty much relevant to the topic. The only distracting thing is that the information is very plentiful, which is great but it is hard to read. It would be best if there was a concise introduction, and then more information on the rest of the stuff. The citations are reliable and the links work meaning that the information is able to be traced.

One problem with this page is that the modern botany section isn’t that modern. It includes information that happened within the last decade, but it would be helpful to have very current day information on botany.

Cyanobacteria: This article has a lot of information on cyanobacteria, unfortunately it is kind of hard to understand. Although there are links to the other terms used, it would be nice to have simpler terms. The technical language used is distracting. As for the sources, they seem to be in order. They are relevant and actually lead to real websites. The information is not biased, which makes sense because it would be hard to have a bias on this information. Lastly, it would be beneficial if the data was updated, to keep it all up to date.

Pinophyta: This article focuses more on conifers than it does with pinophyta. This is distracting and not so helpful when trying to learn more about pinophyta. The references and the breakdown of the article are well done though. Also, there are no further readings, which is concerning because those are very useful in learning more about the opic as well as fact checking.