User:Vleon208/Deforestation of the Amazon rainforest/Keirasullivan Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Vleon208
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Vleon208/Deforestation of the Amazon rainforest

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? New content has been added
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes, user describes the rainforest's size and species.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Yes, the user names the different major sections such as the species, its size and how much of the rain forest has been demolished.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? The lead is concise.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes it is
 * Is the content added up-to-date? Yes
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? No

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? Yes, just further claims already made.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No, the article doesn't take particular positions
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No, I think the user agrees with the article's original content

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes, sources are reliable
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes, the source are reflective of the articles content
 * Are the sources current? For the most part, yes
 * Check a few links. Do they work? All the links work.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Very concise and easy to read
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? Not that I noticed
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes, the content is broken down into different sections

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? The article had more added to it but it isn't fully complete.
 * What are the strengths of the content added? Not much was added but good thoughts were provoked by the user.
 * How can the content added be improved? By adding more detailed content it can be improved.