User:VoABot II/Mistakes

Report mistakes below in pending section. Please give the diff link to the revert or reverted edit. If that sounds foreign to you, then just give the page name and date. Put new requests under "Pending". Thanks.  Aar on Sc hulz  14:48, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Rainforests
"Despite the growth of vegetation in a rainforest, soil quality is often quite poor. Rapid bacterial decay prevents the accumulation of humus. The concentration of iron and aluminium oxides by the laterization process gives the oxisols a bright red color and sometimes produces minable deposits such as bauxite). On younger substrates, especially of volcanic origin, tropical soils may be quite fertile.We all know we love pizza!!!"

I admit I love pizza, but I've never even looked at this article before.

NOT SURE IF THIS IS THE RIGHT METHOD/ SORRY - im not even logged in an he bot is sending me messages that my edits were spam vandalism etc- edits to pages i havent visited, i havent edited anything. so your bot is sending wackty messages is what im getting at /hope someone sees this /

Sixth Crusade
Your recent edit to Sixth Crusade (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! (Report bot mistakes here) // VoABot II (talk) 01:11, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

While I do agree that subject matter pertaining to any humping being done by my parents is irrelevant to the Sixth Crusade, I am positive that I have never even looked at that page let alone added this tidbit of information. Thanks!

Maltese nobility
Hi. JaGa asked me to clean up Maltese nobility. I did so but you reverted everything! Mobile historian (talk) 19:30, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Argélico Fucks
I'm thinking this should not revert solely for the use of swear-words, at least those which the page title also contains. The edit reverted at face value appears not to be obvious vandalism, but rather a manual-of-style issue over which reasonable people could in this context disagree. — CharlotteWebb 18:07, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

I Love Money
I just got the following user Talk message:

Your recent edit to I Love Money (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! (Report bot mistakes here) // VoABot II (talk) 21:45, 5 October 2008 (UTC

...which is odd, because I've never even seen that article before, let alone edited anything in it.

Shiva Shankar
Got this Talk message: Your recent edit to Shiva Shankar (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! (Report bot mistakes here) // VoABot II (talk) 13:11, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

Not I, said the goose.

Bio
Recurring theme; got a talk message: May 2008 Your recent edit to Bio (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! (Report bot mistakes here) // VoABot II (talk) 23:29, 16 May 2008 (UTC) Only problem, is that the only edits I've done in the last year or so were to add a movie to Bryan Callen's filmography. Cheers.

Gendo Ikari
"Your recent edit to Gendo Ikari (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks" 8 March 2008

No idea what this message is or what it means. I didn't do any edits or anything and I don't have an account, so there you go.

Jane Aagaard
You reverted my edits to Jane Aagaard, but I was removing a large amount of negative and unreferenced information from a BLP. Animatronic Fruit Loop (talk) 18:25, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

Thanks
 * Fixed.  Aar on Sc hulz  07:14, 4 October 2009 (UTC)