User:Vocem Virtutis/Templates

GA Review Template:


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * Generally, I'll fix smaller grammatical errors on my own as I review; if there are larger issues with grammar throughout a page, I'll elaborate below.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * This is the most time-consuming part of the review, at least generally speaking. Most likely, this will be the last bit of the review I finish.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * I'll try and point out any issues I see in this section pretty quickly; after all, issues here can affect the entire article if not acknowledged quickly.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * I hope I don't need to explain why this is important. I'll list any issues I see here ASAP.
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * Not usually an issue, but if it is, this'll sink the nomination pretty quickly.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Another criterion I'll typically try and check early in the review.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: