User:Voicesnow/sandbox

Coronavirus Article:

The coronavirus article was very factual and detailed as it contained a lot of information on when it was first discovered. It detailed a lot of bacterias that are closely related and also part of the virus itself. Everything within the article is very relevant and detail oriented. If one had not studied Microbiology in the past, a lot of the information could go over the head. The writers wrote in a factual manner which allows readers that are not fully knowledgable in microbiology to understand it. Since this is still growing, the facts themselves especially for the most recent case of coronavirus is not fully updated but it shows that this was not the first time that it came about but the third major time in recent history. The links do work and bring you to other wikipedia articles that gives you facts about bacterias and past history of the virus itself. There are over 60 sources to provide information on the coronavirus from common colds to extreme cases on being bed ridden. Most of the information leads to a technology instituted with research behind the information. The article is being updated daily. The article is rated well and is not part of a WikiProject but is only allowed to be edited by administrators of Wikipedia. This topic talks about the history which is different from other people mentioning and does not flame any person or group of people but rather shows how it came to be and the current numbers.

Talk:Coronavirus --> I agree that stating snakes is a possible possibility to not be fully factual especially when it is not proven by other articles. Most cases say that it comes from bats and in some minor cases swine but not snakes. Please find another source to prove the snake theory. Past that, this information brings up a good topic on how the virus transferred from animal to human.