User:Voneal2016/sandbox

Article Evaluation
1. Everything in the article is related to the topic (Kehlani). 2. None of the claims seem biased, they're all based on facts. 3. I think the only thing that may be underrepresented would be the success of her current album. 4.The sources do work, and they do directly relate to the topics they're discussing. 5. Most of the information from the sources come from interviews that the artist did herself. They don't seem biased, but most of the information does come directly from the artist herself. 6. Nothing in the article is out of date, but it's not completely up to date. Her new album isn't really included in the article, but is referenced a few times. 7.There was mostly a debate on which picture to use to represent the artist and what classifies as a mix tape vs. an album. 8.The article is Class C and is part of biography/musicians, R&B and soul music 9.This article isnt really a subject we've talked about in class.<---what I was looking for here, was how does the way Wikipedia discusses topics differ from the way we've talked about writing for other topics in class? For example, we have been talking about how to use sources to create an argumentative or informative essay where often instructors want you to present a point of view or bias, but how is Wikipedia different? Kdavis25 (talk) 02:12, 6 December 2017 (UTC)