User:Voverbo/Dancing plague of 1518/Cotviola Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Voverbo/Dancing Plague of 1518 group


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Voverbo/Dancing plague of 1518


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Dancing plague of 1518

Evaluate the drafted changes

 * Lead. The lead does not reflect any changes made by the group, however the lead as it currently is in the article is good, and does describe the topic in a concise way. It does not really describe what the following sections will be.
 * Content. From what I am seeing it does not appear that there is much content added. The sandbox appears to be a copy of the article.
 * Tone and Balance. The tone of this article is neutral and well balanced.
 * Sources and References. There are a few claims in the article that are without proper sources, but the editors seem to be aware of that as it it noted in the article. Most of the existing sources seem to function well, but there are some that have been removed from the internet, so editors will most likely have to find new ones to replace them.
 * Organization. The article as it currently exists is well organized and easy to read, but I think more could be added.
 * Overall impressions. I think it would be helpful for the editors to add some new content by way of new references and sections.