User:Vreddy226/Coralliidae/Gcharles1357 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Vreddy226

GünniX


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Coralliidae Draft - Wikipedia


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Coralliidae - Wikipedia

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead:

1) The Lead topic sentences are relatively concise and they state, albeit briefly, information about the distribution and genera of Coralliidae. However, the sentences provide little to no information about the description and morphology of the species.

2) All of the information present in the Lead is included in the rest of the article.

3) Although The Lead is pretty concise, more information is needed to most accurately represent the article's content.

Content:1) Most of the content in the draft is up-to-date and relevant to the article's main topics. However, the terms listed in the Morphology section do not need to be included.

2) A little more information could be added to the Description and Distribution sections.

Tone and Balance:

1) The content of the article is neutral. It is not trying advance any viewpoints or persuade any readers to believe in or disavow a position.

Sources and References:

1) The content accurately reflects the sources it's citing. All of the sources, with the exception of one published in 1882, were published in the 2010s or 2020s. It would probably be better if the parts of the article that cite the oldest source use a more up-to-date one.

2) The links for the sources work.

3) However, each of the sources are written by one author. It would be better if sources written by multiple authors are used.

Organization:

1) Although the content is broken down into sections that reflect the topics of the article, it is not always well written. There are numerous instances of poor word choice and sentence structure in the Description and Distribution sections. There are also several grammatical and spelling errors in all of the sections.

Images and Media:

1) There is one image in the current version of the article. It is well-captioned and adheres to Wikipedia's copyright regulations.