User:Vreddy226/Coralliidae/Kevinbr41 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Vreddy226


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Coralliidae - Wikipedia
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Coralliidae - Wikipedia

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead


 * 1) The lead does reflrect the new information that has been published by the writer.
 * 2) The lead includes clear and concise sentences whch briefly describes the article's topic.

Content


 * 1) Content is clear and concise, with up to date information.
 * 2) While brief, there is a lot of in depth information in the genera and morphology categories.
 * 3) All content is relevant to the subject

Tone and Balance


 * 1) The content added is definitely neutral with no clais toward a position, just a presentatin of facts pertaining to the subject.
 * 2) After reading, there are no instances of the content trying to be persuasive in any way.

Sources and references


 * 1) The sources presented are mostly peer reviewed research papers.
 * 2) All sources used to describe the subject are recent articles.
 * 3) Sources are very good and its clear they were carefully chosen by the author.

Organization


 * 1) Content is easy to read and well thought out.
 * 2) I dont see any grammatical or spelling errors in the article.
 * 3) I like how organized the article is, makes it a verd enjoyable read

Images and Media


 * 1) The one image posted appears to follow wikipedias guideline and is properly labeled as a species of coral in the group.
 * 2) More images could be added, specifically in the morphology to highlight the appearance of some of those different physical features.

Overall Impressions


 * 1) Overall, I liked the article, it is very clear you put time into selecting the proper sources and organizing your article. No information is repeated or unnecessary, every sentence has a purpose in regards to informing the reader about this taxonomix family of corals.