User:Vs2022/Cardiovascular disease in women/Abnormalsaline Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Vs2022


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Cardiovascular disease in women


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Cardiovascular disease in women

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead


 * The lead does a good job introducing the topic concisely and clearly explains the importance of the topic
 * Although it does not specifically provide a brief description of all the sections, it provides a good introduction for the rest of the article. It does not seem necessary to provide a brief description here

Content


 * The content is very relevant to the overall topic and provides more detailed information regarding the topic

Tone and Balance


 * Since the topic is bringing awareness to an underrepresented group, it makes sense that there is an emphasis on women vs men. I think the article does a good job underlying the various ways that women are effected by CVD compared to men
 * It still remains neutral especially since it does provide cited statistics about CVD in men

Sources and References


 * New content is cited appropriately from reliable sources
 * The sources are current will the oldest one published in 2010

Organization


 * The content is well organized and is broken up into understandable sections that are easy to follow
 * There are a few grammatical errors but no spelling errors
 * The organization and order of the sections make sense

Images and Media


 * There are no images within the article but due to the nature of the topic, images are not necessary to enhance learning

Overall Impressions


 * The edits definitely enhanced the overall content and understanding about the topic
 * The edits adds more information regarding the CVD risk factors in women, which is very helpful in the overall understanding of CVD in women
 * I think you did a great job expanding on this topic and how CVD differs in women vs men