User:Vshu43/Workweek and weekend/RealShirty Peer Review

General info
Vshu43
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:(reviewing existing article bc no draft found)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Workweek and weekend

Lead:
The lead is pretty strong. It's a bit lengthy, but so is the article itself, so it's not a bad intro. It does seem to give more attention to traditionally Christian and Jewish reasons for a Sat-Sun weekend than it does to other reasons, so some more evenness there could be useful. Otherwise, I think the lead can remain how it is.

Content:
The "History" section focuses a lot more on Western countries and could use clarification on the history of the workweek and weekends in other regions, such as Asia or Africa. The "Length" section is pretty U.S.-centric in its history. Does length even need its own section, when it's covered more thoroughly and with finer-grain precision in other sections?

As for "Around the world", I really like how the table summarizes all the info. The succeeding paragraphs by contrast are just lengthy and hard to get through. Could the paragraphs be eliminated except for countries with extra notes or important history, or at least have the table's information removed from them to avoid redundancy? (Probably something to bring up on the article's talk page, since it looks like there's a lot of activity there and it'd be good to get other editors' input on a big change like that.) The table probably needs citations though.

There's also a ton of discussion on the talk page, so I'd suggest checking that out for more ideas on what to improve instead of repeating what's already there myself.

Tone:
Tone is good. The article is mostly dealing with factual realities rather than opinions, and it's presented as such.

Sources:
The top of the article requests further citation for the article's content, with which I would agree. Trying to find reliable sources to back up the information provided in the article would be a good way to contribute to it. Beyond that, some sources don't seem like the most reliable. For example, source 47 is from the LA Times, but the source of their data on the workweek would be a more appropriate root source to cite. Sources 37 and 38 also cite news articles; honestly, there are a lot of questionable sources for this article that need auditing. Sources 40 and 80 have links which no longer work. I didn't try all links, so this is just a selection of problems.

Organization:
The article could use some more intuitive sectioning, because almost all the content is under the "Around the world" section. "By weekends other than Saturday to Sunday" could become its own section potentially, instead of being a subsection of "Around the world". (The title of "By weekends..." is also somewhat wordy and could be rephrased for succinctness.)

Media:
There are a couple solid images near the beginning of the article's body, then nothing else. The first image (the map showing which days make up the weekend) would fit better near "By weekends other than Saturday to Sunday" imo. The rest of the "Around the world" section could use images, but I'm not sure off the top of my head what might be appropriate...