User:WGST320/American imperialism/Alexa.aa12 Peer Review

the lead does contain major sections covered in the article.

the lead gives a good overview of the article and isn't too long.

the content added extra details and is important to the article.

the content is also up to date.

the added content is neutral and doesn't contain personal opinions

sources for the new content weren't added

couldn't find citations for the new content

the content is well written.

the new content has similar ideas and is necessary

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)