User:WIKI20220/Unborn Victims of Violence Act/Dmar24 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

WIKI20220


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:WIKI20220/Unborn_Victims_of_Violence_Act?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Unborn Victims of Violence Act
 * Unborn Victims of Violence Act

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

LEAD


 * The lead has not been updated
 * The lead does include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic
 * The article includes a description of the article's major sections
 * The article includes information that are present in the article
 * The lead is concise

CONTENT


 * The content added is relevant to the topic
 * The content added it up to date
 * There is no content missing and there is no content that does not belong
 * Yes, the article addresses topics related to historically underrepresented populations and topics

TONE AND BALANCE


 * The content is neutral
 * No, there are no claims that are heavily biased towards a particular position
 * I think the legislative history and the provisions are underrepresented. There could definitely be more information added.
 * No, the content added does not attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another. It is all facts and information being discussed, followed by a citation to find the information.

SOURCES AND REFERENCES


 * Yes, new content is backed up by a reliable secondary source of information
 * The content does accurately reflect what the cited sources say
 * The sources are thorough-they reflect available literature on the topic
 * The sources are current, they are range from the years 2003-2017
 * The sources are written from a diverse spectrum of authors
 * Sources from New York Times would contain very useful and accurate information

ORGANIZATION


 * The content added is well-written, it is concise, clear, and easy to read
 * There are no grammatical errors or spelling errors to the content added
 * The content is well organized

IMAGES AND MEDIA


 * The article does include images when you hold your cursor over the blue highlighted words
 * The images have good descriptions
 * The images do adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations
 * The images that are given are presented in an appealing way, could contain more pictures for some however such as including a picture for some of the people named

******

FOR NEW ARTICLES ONLY


 * Yes, the article does meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements
 * WIKI20220 did not include any references
 * Yes, it follows similar patterns as other articles containing the suggested major section headings
 * There are no sources so it does not direct me to the article easily

OVERALL IMPRESSIONS


 * Provisions were added to the article, this completes it more
 * A strength of the content that was added was it provided provisions of the law
 * The content can be improved by adding references, and more information to the provisions