User:Wakelamp

WP:Wikignome
I found out I am a wiki gnome. I quite like the idea Wakelamp (talk) 14:27, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

Then I started to have doubts about whether wiki gnoming was like being King Canute Wakelamp d&#91;@-@&#93;b (talk) 03:39, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

Automated error checking

Also error check (for references) exists on visual editor,

{{refideas

Do we need a wiki history space?

topics

Have the option to archive on the top/mark as spam - anti toxicity

 Importance and class 

Village pump (miscellaneous)/Archive 73|

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/16/How_to_evaluate_a_Wikipedia_article.pdf

Content assessment

Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Chemistry articles by quality log

 Inconsistency on edit interface 

Are there different options available on

talk,

user talk (add section, full visual (but the buttons stay at the top of the edit window)

user (no add section, full visual editor, edit and edit source option)

article

article talk

village pump

Reverts

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Buttered_cat_paradox&oldid=prev&diff=1130523803&diffmode=visual

There is no clear call to action

It encourages you to dispute on user talk ...

Civility
Database download Database_download https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:AbuseFilter https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:No_personal_attacks https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Edit_filter https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Long-term_abuse https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Harassment#Dealing_with_harassment https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Civility https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Civility_enforcement/Questionnaire https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Protection_policy https://github.com/ewulczyn/wiki-detox/blob/master/src/figshare/Wikipedia%20Talk%20Data%20-%20Getting%20Started.ipynb

Harassment

No personal attacks

Blocking policy

Wikipedia is failing

toxicity
https://ewulczyn.github.io/images/ex_machina.pdf

https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Private_Incident_Reporting_System

WMF and WP interaction
https://freakonomics.com/podcast/thats-a-great-question-rebroadcast/

User Stories
?????

Autism
Advice to editors sounds like for Autism

https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Hackathons/Handbook/Mentoring_Tips

User pages


 * Wakelamp
 * Wakelamp/Draft Esme Levant
 * Wakelamp/One
 * Wakelamp/TalkPageUseCase
 * Wakelamp/VP Proposal WP WMF v1
 * Wakelamp/common.css
 * Wakelamp/common.js
 * Wakelamp/sandbox

New Article

Do we need a new popup style? Embedded ? on top o, in white space, better choice structure?

Tools and Statistics
Misc

Special:Prefixindex/User:Your_Wikipedia_Name
Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Statistics

Copy editing - Wikipedia
Can You Pin a topic - yes - Start PIN

Communication Issues


 * opportunities
 * use ORES to picki interesting conversations (including higher levels of cobflict, article squatting
 * Increaase networking on local levels
 * RSS like feed??
 * issues database
 * Open source Editor

constraints

anti social network

ASD communication styles

Bad actors - ?? Are Murdoch references really being removed

List of Problems

 * Editor shortages
 * learning curve (user age, user boards, talk are impossible to catch up on
 * Hyperfocus
 * Warning of Article Conflict
 * Non value added,
 * Reverts -make it easier to interact instead?
 * WMF statements in the media
 * New editors that quit
 * Guideline inflexibility
 * Dead Projects- who changes item class?
 * NPP/AfC/AfD
 * Dogpile
 * Community building
 * Signpost
 * Cross Links
 * Creati Village Pump type
 * Talk page
 * Shortcode translator, short code menu
 * Visibility of relationship strength of editors, admin status
 * Not commented on
 * Need flaggings, unarchive,
 * Archiving - Is there a point? Could we just fold them up,
 * Why not have a topic fold/close button
 * Nearly all Projects serve no purpose
 * Projects not being updated
 * Who adds portal to articles
 * Article
 * Code folding
 * Developer
 * Are there? Why?
 * Roadmap
 * AMA / Interaction
 * Volunteer becomes paid (Admin as well)?
 * Reader declines
 * Banners
 * Overly technical
 * Generational shift
 * En translations
 * Dispassionate, anger
 * Abstract and Wikidata cultural imperialism
 * Points of conflict/roadblocks
 * Proposal Process
 * No warning of article conflict
 * Five Pillars are not guidelines But do they match reality -what are the real ones?
 * privacy, but openness of actions - watchers? Can't view own page watchers, no way of protecting own page
 * merciless
 * Complexity ??? Templates/ Guideline
 * Status Quo bias?


 * WMF
 * ED
 * Humble Editors
 * Why paid compared to comp tech?
 * CV YEHAPPRI
 * Trustee
 * CofI
 * Voting wmf personal, scrutineering, bloc, genc
 * Split into multi committees,
 * Financial competence
 * Policies
 * YPMTV - HS,BwBS
 * Legal
 * Tides contract
 * Endowment structure
 * Will not represent Editors,
 * Advisory Board
 * CoI
 * Time on board
 * Board
 * Power imbalance
 * UCoC
 * Policy changes, oversight
 * Annual Report decline
 * KPis of areas
 * Bonuses for donation staff
 * Not part of salary surveys for any NP group
 * Poverty porn - why break privacy?
 * KPI focus - IP editors
 * Finance department
 * Endowment
 * Governance
 * Efficiency
 * CoI
 * Annual Report
 * DAR
 * Bonds
 * Policies
 * Policy Setting
 * Confidentiality
 * Privacy - not complete
 * Staff
 * Socioeconomic and educational diversity
 * Non geo
 * Sales / Grant Staff
 * Data privacy
 * User journey
 * AI can predict gender? ASD
 * Ip address
 * WP
 * Use Cases (WMF did a big s/s)
 * Do you need permissions to run ORES?
 * Researchers
 * Send code of ethics to all universities saying all research data must be released? it's open source but
 * FB/META/Jigsaw
 * Affect of new editor survey on retention
 * Statistics
 * AfD gender vs ASD
 * Speedy
 * New Editor after AfD Founder and Enterprise and abstract and wiki fan
 * Community outreach
 * Target market
 * NF, SF, vs NT, ST, E, Vs I,
 * Activist vs Archivist
 * Library access
 * Same as institution
 * Crowd source part of it
 * Anger and Discrimination
 * Article squatting
 * Aspie cluelessness
 * Power Imbalance, control
 * Unclear rules, verbose, untimely, not mistake proof
 * How much do the talk and article structure affect behaviour
 * Why do Dev use etherpad?
 * Proposals don't get summarised
 * Are there auto BA tools for classifying comments?
 * Sum of all knowledge fallacy
 * Greek Parthenon/Jason's Ship fallacy
 * AMA for projects
 * Privacy
 * Why exact geo?
 * Ditto for user paths
 * NPP
 * Page Curation - MediaWiki
 * Statistics on Speedt

User:Risker/Risker's checklist for content-creation extensions - Wikipedia

Browser add-in ,,,, or part of privacy badger?

 * - show plagiarism
 * - show how many interactions you have had with someone - and "aura" see whirlopool.net.au
 * - roll over for short codes
 * - avatars??
 * - link to discord?
 * - also is there a special copy for user ping?
 * - article risk of conflict (number of reversions)
 * - editor risk of conflict
 * Predicted chance of reversal
 * Reference needed warning on publish
 * menu for JS
 * predictive suggestions for JS
 * mark links based on reputation

Org Chart
Statistics for unsafe vs uncomfortable

China was high

The number of contacts with Safety didn't make sense

Why acceptance of bad behaviour

How does FA/GA work

Autism %

Are Categories used? Why not have a link to external talk. people space

Article based on Autistic man sacked
https://uxdesign.cc/autism-designs-how-to-build-inclusive-products-for-people-with-autism-13c6f555f1e7


 * Editors with some autism spectrum traits may have additional UX issues(Caveat "If you know a person with autism, you know one person with autism."). This table from here is a summary, but more details Personalisation/Customisation is essential. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/276495184_User_Interface_for_People_with_Autism_Spectrum_Disorders
 * Reluctance to change, often due to a personal cost/benefit/risk calculation.
 * Function over form, using Linux an example "The command line trades away discoverability, in exchange for efficiency and flexibility", BUT people become power users because of the discoverability (So for instance, all the js we add as menus, would highly interest some potential editors if it was viewable to all, and greyed out), but WMF must cope with Power users/Editors and minimalists/readers   essay

Charity
Support I have been using it and I like it. It's a big change so i expect bugs. It seems to crash on Edge occassionally. On Chrome, editor menus page. more, tw don't play well together (can't open more). I wonder if fundraising realises that it might decrease down donations over the long term.Our brand is our site LOOKS like it is shabby, old fashioned, designed by ASD/Nerds/Honest clever people (or in the oft repeated words of the CEO "humble" = poor = needy = give us money because we can't find our car keys? But they haven't much choice as readers are declining. Possibly asking for a donation that is 1/3 of a days wage in India, and then bring up a shame type banner if they don't, might be an issue? Wakelamp d[@-@]b (talk) 12:31 am, 3 October 2022, Monday (11 days ago) (UTC+11)


 * @Mr. C.C. "now Not saying Wikipedia would do that, " It's basically what WMF do now with the banner ads. if you don't click xhttps://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:EN_(AU)_Wikipedia_Banner_fundraising_24th_September_2022_01.png
 * then when you scroll down you get another guilt banner that takes up 1/2 the screen.
 * https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:EN_(AU)_Wikipedia_Banner_fundraising_24th_September_2022_02.png
 * And they ask for the same amount in India - but it's equivalent to a third of the median wage everywhere, when its a third of a days wagehttps://wikimediafoundation.org/news/2020/08/05/fundraising-campaign-in-india/
 * (The reason it is in English is that WMF funds found people gave more - The median donation is I think $14, so the end result is that we make the vast majority feel bad (guilt plus reminder of their poverty) so the Middle Class will give more, Wakelamp d[@-@]b (talk) 3:58 pm, Today (UTC+11)

Cool Wiktionary Features
New Articles

- Entry Templates

Atom feed

Search on recent changes

Clean Style

DE Wikipedia
Clean Templates

The WMF process baffles me
Communication (no quarterly AMAs/streaming video chats, monthly report),


 * 1) Strategic planning (No long term roadmap >1 year, community and tech requests being called a 'wishlist'),
 * 2) People  (10 year attracted developers,
 * 3) 5 ! separate IT departments), and
 * 4) Prioritisation ( Fundraising seems to be number one https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/tag/wmde-fundraising-tech/the community being asked to create 'wishlists' rather than plans,....)

The 5 departments breaks ([separation of duties] and organisation silos

"Gleeson and Rozo suggest that a silo mindset "does not appear accidentally... more often than not, silos are the result of a conflicted leadership team. Creating a "unified leadership team" is seen as a key remedy which will "encourage trust, create empowerment, and break managers out of their 'my department' mentality and into the 'our organization' mentality"

References

https://www.hrp-journal.com/index.php/pru/article/view/272
Wikipedia

WikiProject Lists

[[Wikipedia:Database reports/WikiProject watchers]]

WikiProject Council/Directory/Wikipedia

Wikipedia library

WikiProject Missing encyclopedic articles/Distributed indexing

WikiProject Resource Exchange

WorldCat has amazing features BUT Where does i get it's data from

Wikipedia Projects of interest

WikiProject Usability

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Council

WikiProject Democracy

Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub improvement

WikiProject Reforming Wikipedia

Unsuccessful WMF- WP Editor Integration

Wikimedia Blog/Drafts/Lead our development process as a product adviser or manager - Meta

A/B testing

C.V. Whitney Pictures [WorldCat Identities]

Other Features

Scrum-of-Scrums | Etherpad (wikimedia

Wikimedia

Growth/Discussing potential Growth ideas - MediaWiki



https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Product_Guidance

Wikimedia Product Guidance

Shared Knowledge/Projects/Wikiexperiments - Meta (wikimedia.org)

Wikimedia Foundation Medium-term plan 2019/Annual Plan 2021-2022 - Meta

Shared Knowledge/Projects/Wikiexperiments - Meta (wikimedia.org)

Growth - MediaWiki

www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Growth/Engage_with_the_Growth_team

Excellent Presentation

2019:Community Growth/WMF Growth team: what we know about newcomers and how to nurture them - Wikimania (wikimedia.org)



Google Books

How I hacked Google Books “missing pages” | by Edan Weis | Medium

Finance
The finances of free knowledge: Lessons in transparency and impact – Wikimedia Foundation Financial Reports – Wikimedia Foundation
 * UPLOAD COPY of FY 21-22 COMMUNITY APP Deck (wikimedia.org)

Citation
This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.

Find sources: "St Thomas More High School" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (May 2017) ( Learn how and when to remove this template message )

Citations
 * Reading references is enjoyable
 * No curated reference (NPP reputation tools) search engine similar to the film project's. Ability to exclude self published, google books without preview, and check for alternate names listed on article WP names only on google integration with WP library, check alternate name check)
 * No AI to aid selection of articles -  relative closedness of multiple search terms
 * JSTOR is mentioned in template for cites is restricted to 500 edits, so excludes new users that know citations
 * Time intensive per article
 * Google Books. Google books cite is not context sensitive (so manual entry of chapter name, page, chapter author, cannot look up book reference numbers for "citing:) No option for WP cite style.  use of Google books API to provide snippets, google site is missing data references )
 * high friction for copying quotes from no copy pages - no image ocr to text tool, or special approval from Authors' Guild & Google
 * Citation process is not mistake proof (Could it auto-choose reference type, google books_
 * Not mistake proof, high friction (low chance of flow state), Enjoyable finding their references, citing google books is tricky (finding chapter, page,)
 * No wp format cite option),
 * Belief that tagging/categorisation/templating encourages new editors and effort on STUBs, Instead it means additional work to remove - let the editor judge what has to be done
 * Fear that fixing stubs will create extra work

Privacy and Security
http://www.aaronsw.com/weblog/whowriteswikipedia https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Unregistered_user

But geolocation, ... are anon keys anon

Why no bug bounty?

Stack exchange
Wow on Adam's Bridge. I quite like stack exchange's system that you need x reputation to comment on controversial topics. ~