User:Walkera47/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.)

Non-binary gender

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose it because I am a non-binary woman and thus interested in the topic.

Information on non-binary gender identities matter because many people do not fit into the gender binary designed by society.

Preliminarily, I was impressed by the comprehensiveness of this article. I learned a lot about my own gender identity in the process of reading.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

Lead section: Meets all criteria to be considered "good." Clear, concise, and comprehensive.

Content: Relevant, up-to-date (2021), comprehensive, addresses historically underrepresented population/topic.

Tone/Balance: neutral, unbiased, neither niche nor broad in scope, does not attempt to persuade readers.

Sources: Meet all criteria to be considered "good." Ample, accurate, recent, etc.

Organization/Writing quality: Well-written, clear, concise, comprehensive, well-organized.

Images and media: Meet all criteria to be considered "good." Ample, informative, allowable, well-placed, etc.

Talk page: Many relevant discussions pertaining to gender identity and potential additions/removals can be found on the talk page. Rated a C-class. Used in WikiProjects for gender studies and LGTBQ studies.

Overall impressions: It's overall status is C-class, so could be improved, but usable as it is. I think its strengths are in its credible sources and that the extrapolation of those sources could be improved, perhaps for readability. I must be new to wikipedia or something (aha!) because the article looks fantastic to me, but it only has a rating of C-class!