User:Walti13/Brooklyn Marathon/N insinna12 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username) Walti13


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Walti13/Brooklyn_Marathon?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Brooklyn Marathon

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

I think that your article is very well written and seems professional. I think that you used your sources very well and made sure to use one after each sentence, which proves that what you are saying is facts. Your draft seems to be neutral with no biases or opinions in the article. The content seems to be up to date and relevant as well. One thing I think you could do to make the article better is to go in more depth about the history behind the race itself and also talk a little more about the race course or any notable previous winners just to fill in a little more to the article. All in all I think that the article is good and doesn't need much work besides the few things I listed. I will take a few things from your article to add into mine like how well written it was and how you were able to cite almost every sentence with a source.