User:Walti13/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.) Ecocriticism

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose this article about Ecocriticism because it was a completely new concept to me and I didn't know anything about the topic beforehand. My preliminary impression of it was that it was clear and concise.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The lead is concise and introduces the topic without a lot of repetition. It doesn't include any new information. It does somewhat include what sections that it will be covering through the description.

I don't see any views that are biased and it seems to use a neutral tone.

It includes a lot of sources with many footnotes in each paragraph. Some of the sources are not as up to date with some being before the 2000s.

The article seems to be organized well in blocks with each block focusing on a specific topic.

There are no images in the article. There is a lot of activity on the talk page which shows that multiple editors and reviewers have looked over this page.

The article's strengths lie in the fact that it is written well and concisely but it could be better through the inclusion of some visual media to clearly show the topic better.