User:Walton One/Sandbox 2

''This is a test page, please ignore it. It does not currently represent a plan to refactor RfA, nor does it reflect the views of the user with whom it is associated.''

RandomUser01

 * - This is a self nomination because I think I would be a great administrator.

Questions for the candidate

 * 1) What admin work do you intend to take part in?
 * Answer
 * 1) What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
 * Answer
 * 1) Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * Answer

Discussion
In this section, the user will be evaluated against the principal criteria for adminship. Please comment in each section where needed.

Although numbers will be counted in evaluating each section, this is not a vote. Where possible, please provide evidence for your viewpoint (ideally in the form of diffs). Further discussion may be moved to the talk page.

Experience

 * Has this candidate edited Wikipedia for long enough, and made enough relevant and productive edits, to be a suitable candidate for adminship? (Note to bureaucrats: If the result of this section is No, but the other sections return a consensus of Yes, the outcome of the request is likely to be "Fail Encourage".)

Understanding of adminship

 * Based on his/her answer to question 1 above, and on the candidate's experience with Wikipedia discussions and processes, has the candidate demonstrated that s/he understands the purpose of the administrator tools, and would be able to use them in appropriate ways? (Note to bureaucrats: If the result of this section is No, but the other sections return a consensus of Yes, the outcome of the request is likely to be "Fail Encourage".)

Trust and good faith

 * Based on his/her record on Wikipedia, has the candidate demonstrated that s/he is acting in good faith, supports the goals of the Wikipedia project, and would not wilfully abuse the administrator tools or use them in a manner detrimental to Wikipedia?

Character and civility

 * Based on his/her record on Wikipedia, and on his/her answer to question 3 above, has the candidate demonstrated that s/he has an appropriate temperament to serve as a Wikipedia administrator, including an appropriately civil and mature attitude?

Outcome
This section is for bureaucrats only. Non-bureaucrats should not edit this section, but can leave comments and evidence on the talk page for the bureaucrats to consider.

The closing bureaucrat should sign below under the "Result" header, and indicate the outcome of this request. The outcome may be one of the following:


 * Pass - The candidate has been promoted to adminship.
 * Fail Encourage - The candidate does not have sufficient experience to become an administrator, but is encouraged to apply again after a suitable period.
 * Fail - The candidate is unsuited to be an administrator.