User:Wanderer2202/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Article title: Community economic development:
 * Article Evaluation: The article talks about how communities work together to improve their local economy. It does not take sides or push any particular ideas, which means that the article is written neutrally. Not every fact is backed up with a source in the text, but there are references listed at the end and the references seem trustworthy. The article does not directly talk about fairness or covering all communities equally. It could be improved by discussing how these efforts help everyone, especially for indigenous people. :
 * Sources
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Community_economic_development

Option 2

 * Article title: Center for Economic and Social Development:
 * Article Evaluation: The article talks about the Center for Economic and Social Development (CESD) and its activities in Azerbaijan. It seems neutral, providing information without favoring any particular viewpoint. Not every claim has a citation within the text. There are not quite relevant source in reference list of the article and the reference list is not organised. The article doesn't directly address equity gaps or underrepresented populations. It focuses more on the activities and achievements of CESD in Azerbaijan. :
 * Sources:
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_development_theory

Option 3

 * Article title: Social development theory:
 * Article Evaluation: The article discusses social development theory, which explains qualitative changes in society's structure and organization. The neutrality of the article is debatable as it includes personal reflections and arguments, which might not align with Wikipedia's guidelines for neutrality. The article lacks inline citations for many claims, making it difficult to verify the information provided. Without inline citations, it is challenging to assess the reliability of the sources used in the article. The article addresses the topic of social development theory, which is relevant to understanding societal progress and change. However, it does not explicitly tackle Wikipedia's equity gaps. :
 * Sources:
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_development_theory