User:Wapisiw/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Donna Haraway

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose this article because I find Donna Haraway interesting and have enjoyed her contribution to multi-species care ethics and relationships. My first impression is that it's quite word-y. S

Evaluate the article
The lead section, I believe, is over-detailed. A lot of the information could be provided in their own sections on her work or the recurring themes in her work, since there is a section dedicated to "Major Themes." The lead section goes quite into Haraway's beliefs which could be in their own section as well.

It could use some organization. In the "Later Work" section, it includes personal life details which are not relevant to the section.

Strengths of the article are how comprehensive it is and it does a good job at leading readers to similar topics. It is well cited as well.