User:Warrix1218/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Biblical studies - Wikipedia.)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Because it is the most widely discussed book in the United States and I have never full read it myself.)

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The lead section gives a good overview of what to expect in the bulk of the article. The content includes relevant topics in the many fields that is being covered in the article. From the origins of the topic to the more modern studies of the topic. The tone of the article is non-biases and provides clear and concise information while listing the sources of the information. All of the links and sources are clickable and work without hassle. The article is sectioned appropriately from the definition of the topic to its practices. It does not use much imagery or media in the article but the imagery it does have is perfect for the context of the article. The talk page is full of information and critiques on how the article can be improved. There is even full documentation of sections that had been removed in order to provide more accurate up to date information on the topic. It drastically needs improvements on both its citing's and sources. It seems to be lacking sources in several sections although it does have the references and appropriate links available. Adding citations where needed can greatly improve the quality of this article.