User:Water King's Falcon/Lifespan Development of Writing/Gooobster Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Water King's Falcon


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Water%20King's%20Falcon/Lifespan_Development_of_Writing?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead
a good lead concise lead. a few citations are still needed but the author did make note of it.

Content
Defensibly an article in the process of a first draft. many of the sections do not have any information. The section with content is informative enough.

What year of child's development do they reach milestone of reading comprehension?

Tone and Balance
Tone is nicely balanced no hint of editorialization

Source and references
four sources are given all of them important to the article as a whole. only one of them is cited directly, all links work

Organization
no grammatical or spelling errors.

the word "individual" is used a bit too often.

Images and Media
there are no images

For New Article Only
The article need related article links for key words. Child development could be one

Overall Impressions
This is a good start. if the quality of the lead and first section continue for the whole article, then this can be a good article. just needs citations. links to other related articles will easily improve the quality.