User:Watermelemily/Horse Island New York/Morgbwoodard Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? watermelemily

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing User:Watermelemily/Horse Island New York
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Lead
-Very concise and a good introduction

-Good brief description

Content
- The content is relevant to the topic since it happened there

-I feel like the light outs could get its own big header

Tone and Balance
- You did a very good job on staying neutral

-There was not really any bias I thought of one side being portrayed stronger than another.

Sources and References
-All of the sources are from reliable sources and pretty current.

-I believe most things are backed up by the sources provided.

- The links I checked work

Organization
-I feel like the organization is good so far

- As mentioned earlier I feel like the light house could get its own heading because it was not as related to the battle as the archaeological findings.

New Article
-The sources were adequate for the information

- The article does have links to other articles

Overall
-Tone was very good

- Good content related to the subject

- I would not pull as much attention to the specific battle as mentioned earlier.

- I did think all the content provided though was relevant.