User:Wboy02/History of Hawaii/Nat2026 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Wboy02


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Wboy02/History_of_Hawaii?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * History of Hawaii

Lead
Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?


 * No, it appears the lead is already very developed and my peer chose to edit a different section that needed more attention than the lead. Within the section my peer is editing, there is a well developed lead where he added information on the significance of Haley's comet in Hawaiian culture.

Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?


 * Yes, the lead of this particular section provides a nice introduction for me of what the House of Kamehameha is. This clearly describes the founder as well as the reign of the royal family and provides a great transition into the following section.

Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?


 * The lead is very clear with excellent details

Content
Is the content added relevant to the topic?



Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?



Tone and Balance
Is the content added neutral?



Sources and References
Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?



Are the sources thorough?



'''Check a few links. Do they work?'''



Organization
Is the content added well written - i.e. is it concise, clear, and easy to read?



Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?



Is the content added well organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?



Images and Media
Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?



Are images well captioned?



Overall Impressions
Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. is the article more complete?