User:Wdtseng/Late talker/Emmabrizendine Peer Review

General info

 * Jmartinezhernandez & Wdtseng
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: Late talker

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * The Lead has been updated to reflect the new content added by my peer.
 * The Lead includes an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the Late talker.
 * The Lead does, in fact, include a brief description of the article's major sections.
 * A lot of the material in the article has been added and updated to the original article.
 * The Lead is a little over detailed but it is just enough to get the point across and be able to define a Late talker.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * The content added is relevant to the topic.
 * The content that has been added is up to date.
 * There is no content that is unnecessary or not needed.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * The added content is neutral.
 * There is no bias from what I saw.
 * It doesn't persuade the reader to do anything. It just informs them on what a late talker is.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * All new content is backed up by a reliable secondary source of information.
 * The sources are thorough and current.
 * All of the links seem to work.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * The content added is way to read.
 * I did not see any grammatical errors within the edited article.
 * The content is very well-organized.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * There are no images within the article.

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject? Yes.
 * The list of sources accurately represent all available literature on the Late talker.
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary info boxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles? Yes, it does.
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable? Yes, it does.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * The overall quality of the article has improved.
 * It is much easier to determine what a Late talker is and the details behind it.
 * My only concern is that the article can be split into more paragraphs with less sentences in each paragraph so it's easier on the eyes and the reader won't have a hard time reading the material.