User:Webb.Zach02/Choose an Article

Option 1

 * Article title- Communication Design
 * Article Evaluation- The article has a warning at the top of it saying it needs more citations to back up its information and it also needs to be more clear. It is also said in the talk page that the topics being discussed below the main topic need to be further developed or removed. There should be more information provided about the main topic rather than the having the amount of information in the subtopics it has. The lead gives a brief overview of the main topic but there is not much information to back it up. There are also a crazy amount of topics listed under communication design but there is not many subtopics on it's own page.
 * Sources- Full article:
 * https://doi.org/10.1080/21650349.2013.794720
 * https://www.tandfonline.com/action/showCitFormats?doi=10.1386%2Fjmpr.8.3.359_1
 * https://www.tandfonline.com/action/showCitFormats?doi=10.2752%2F175630614X13787503069918
 * https://www.tandfonline.com/action/showCitFormats?doi=10.1386%2Fjmpr.8.3.359_1
 * https://www.tandfonline.com/action/showCitFormats?doi=10.2752%2F175630614X13787503069918

Option 2

 * Article title- Health Communication
 * Article Evaluation- The lead in the page gives a general idea of what Health Communication is. However, it does not mention anything else about the subtopics. There are also two topics that are mentioned which makes me wonder if more topics along that line should be involved. (Cardiovascular disease, American Small Pox) I think that the Covid-19 Pandemic might need to be added to the page or these two topics need to be removed. The article uses these two instances to explain the different times and how they communicated the disease, which brings me to want to put the the pandemic we live in right now in the article. Basically, I believe the article just needs to be updated.
 * Sources
 * https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2010.496604
 * https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2014.954080
 * https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2014.999891
 * https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2014.954080
 * https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2014.999891

Option 3

 * Article title- Media Studies
 * Article Evaluation- The articles lead gives a brief idea of what Media Studies is and also lists many other topics that could be related to it. Although, I do believe the lead should be more detailed about what the page will be talking about. It is stated in the talk page that most of the citations provided seem to be reliable. I think it is an interesting way to build the page by establishing how the topic is used in different countries, that way it gives the readers different perspectives. Which leads me to understand that the page certainly can not be biased about the topic. I think the page could also have more graphics or pictures to go along with the subject.
 * Sources
 * https://doi.org/10.1080/15358593.2019.1667015
 * https://doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2022.2063259
 * https://doi.org/10.1080/10304319909365796
 * https://doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2022.2063259
 * https://doi.org/10.1080/10304319909365796

Option 4

 * Article title- Communication Ethics
 * Article Evaluation- The lead does really well with explaining the topic and what is going to be talked about below. This article probably has the least amount of problems comparing it to the other ones above. However, there are not as many citations involved in the bottom of the page compared to the other articles. I find this topic a lot more intriguing than the other ones due to me being a business major. I think that there could be at least a few graphics or images used in the page to make it more interesting.
 * Sources
 * https://doi.org/10.1080/15358593.2015.1114138
 * https://doi.org/10.1080/15358590600763334
 * https://doi.org/10.1080/17404622.2019.1575430
 * https://doi.org/10.1080/15358590600763334
 * https://doi.org/10.1080/17404622.2019.1575430

Option 5

 * Article title- History of Communication
 * Article Evaluation- This page about the History of Communication is definitely the most developed out of all the articles. It has many sources provided below about the topic and they seem to be reliable. The page goes over the history with how people have communicated over the years, which is exactly what is stated in the lead paragraph. The page also gives timelines for certain subjects that are involved with communication which is very helpful. I believe this page does really well with using graphics and images to help put out a visual for the readers which is very helpful.
 * Sources
 * https://doi.org/10.2752/146069203790219371
 * https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-6599(93)90312-E
 * https://doi.org/10.1080/00947679.1975.12066769
 * https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-6599(93)90312-E
 * https://doi.org/10.1080/00947679.1975.12066769