User:Webb.Zach02/Communication ethics/Wolfpack3810 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Webb.Zach02


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Webb.Zach02/Communication_ethics?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Communication ethics

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

To start off this peer review I will be talking about the things I thought Zach did well throughout his draft. When reading each section I found it to flow very nicely. Also, it was very easy to see what section he was editing with the subsection titles before each paragraph. Throughout the draft there weren't any errors in grammar, spelling, etc. But a recommendation I do have is that there is a lot of potential to add to this topic. When looking back at the original article most of the information is located within the draft which goes to show the potential for so much more information. For this article to become discovered by more people maybe trying to linking it to other Wikipedia articles could be beneficial. Overall, I believe this is a very good first draft but has the potential to have so much more information on it.