User:Webb.Zach02/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
New York Jets - Wikipedia

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because I am a HUGE Jets fan! I feel as if I know more about the Jets than anyone I have ever met. It matters because they are a professional football team and a lot of people care about the facts of the team! (At least I do) My preliminary impression is that I love the Jets!

Evaluate the article
The first sentence of the article is good because it establishes who the New York Jets are. However, the first paragraph of the article only spits out a few interesting facts about the New York Jets. Rather than give a overview of what the article talks about. Although, it does mention some things about what is talked about later in the article. I feel as if it is overly detailed about a few things in the opening paragraph because it just states a few facts that is not needed in the overview. It is easy to say that the article is relevant to the topic because it talks about the Jets throughout the entire article. The article is not up to date because it does not talk about how the team has recently been playing. Which leads me to say that the article is missing content because we do not know how the team is playing recently. After looking through the talk page, it shows that this article was built by a lot of NFL fans and some of them could be just Jets fans. And that shows me the article could be a little bias about the Jets. Although, I do not believe the article attempts to persuade the reader in anyway. Overall, I would say that the article is neutral because it is kind of hard to be bias in this topic. After checking some of the sources, they back up the information of the article very nicely. I also checked a few of the links and they took me to other articles, even the link that I put in still works! The grammar and writing quality of the article is very well written, especially the line that I fixed a week ago! A week ago it was hard for me to find any grammar errors and the flow of the article is really smooth. However, I do think that they could have put the Notable First Round Picks section before the current roster because I feel like it is on an island with it being after all of the diagrams. I think that there could have been more images for the Wikipedia page, especially if it is possible to get one for each owner. However, the diagrams showing the current roster, Hall of Famers, and other interesting factors of the team is a good thing to have for the article. The only conversations happening in the talk page is the different requests to fix the page. Overall, I think that this article is good one because of the flow, sources, details and diagrams. However, I do think that the article could add on to it's more recent years and how they are currently playing. This page is well-developed and it was rated as a good article in the talk page.