User:Weber.cdeyoung/Pseudomonas quinolone signal/Natpollock Peer Review

General info
(provide username) Weber.cdeyoung
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:Pseudomonas quinolone signal
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Pseudomonas quinolone signal

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead: No recommendations. Excellent flow and writing, easilu understood by others with little to no knowledge of the topic.

Content: No recommendations

Tone and Balance: No recommendations

Sources and References: No recommendations

Organization:  No recommendations

Images and media: No recommendations

Overall impression: An EXCELLENT article. Incredibly well written, beautiful flow, and it's very easy to understand what's being explained and what they do. 9/10.