User:WedyanAlmohammadi/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Phenotype

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I choose phenotype because It is part of what I study in the class. I'm interested to know more about the phenotype of generations. my impression of the topic is having a general idea of what phenotype means with some explanation and examples. I like the way they illustrate the paper with sequential thoughts and related pictures.

Evaluate the article
The article in the lead section explains the meaning of Phenotype in general. It also expresses briefly the basic factors of the topic and mentions the famous scientists to the topic scientists such as Wilhelm Johannsen and August Weismann. It gives a well-explanation of the topic without many details. Even though the content of the article is related to the topic and updated, the content could be improved by including some information about the genes that make each one different than others by giving summarize of how the SNPs (Single Nucleotide Polymorphism) affect the person's phenotype. The article is from a neutral point of view. There are no claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position. That means it explains the topic without any persuade the reader to any position. The source needs to update. The sources and references are quite current, but there is little question that they could be expanded. All the links are working, so the reader could click and read more information related to the topic. For the organization and writing quality article is clear and understandable. This helps individuals with little or no knowledge of the subject to get a general notion of what it's about. There is no grammar or spelling mistakes and the fact that Wikipedia editors are aware of it and correct the mistake if they found it. In general, the article is organized, and each section explains very carefully. The article has clean, simple, and colorful images and media with brief explanations for each picture and that could help to understand some of the knowledge given. All photos follow Wikipedia's copyright guidelines. In the talk section, the conversation is explaining some aspects that are lack of understanding. The article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale, and Mid-importance on the project's importance scale of WikiProject Genetics. I hadn't considered some of the issues raised by the instructors, but I believe that they should be considered. It certainly aids in evaluating the adjustments as necessary that might be done to make the content more complete. Overall impressions, the article clearly demonstrates the phenotype in general with some examples and details with a good length and clear words. The arrangement, wording, visuals aid the reader in ensuring understanding and smoothly follow the information. Lastly, the writers create a phenomenal page, but they need to keep it updated and explains some lack of understanding points.