User:Weetoy3424/sandbox

Article evaluation
I chose the article that represents the event called Europride. I found that the article was completely relevant and it did a great job of staging the event and it's history. I think the only distraction is the big table should go after the last paragraph because I felt that the article was finished and then there was another paragraph that I found to be very important.

I felt that the article was not very biased. It seemed like a textbook narrative stating historical facts and events. One of the underrepresented ideas in the article is the historical opposition to the event.

I clicked on several citations and all of them were functional and relevant. Throughout the history section however there seems to be some missing citations. They could pass as common knowledge but I could see some of the descriptions of the being cited by another author.

The information is closely updated. It has yet to update the 2017 Europride parade which happened in Madrid. The last information given to us was that they were selected to host it.

On the talk page there are a couple corrections to external links as well as several grammar changes. There is one question of misrepresenting a quote that I believe was resolved. The article is "of interest" to WikiProject LGBT studies as well as WikiProject Europe. It is related to our class because of the regional expression of queer identity. It

The article does not talk necessarily differently than we have just has a more historical approach to queerness and less a philosophical approach to queerness.

Translating articles
Creu de Sant Jordi is a prestigious civil distinctions award given in Catalonia. I stumbled upon this page by clicking on Joan Borràs' page (one of the actors in Cambio de sexo (película). The Spanish version of the article gives the description of the award and its importance. It additionally gives a description of the materials that make up the award as well as the history and reasoning behind the materials. I found this section important supplementary information for the award as someone who has never heard or read of it before.

The English version lacks the second section completely. For the English page I definitely add this section as well as a new section for both the English and the Spanish versions. I think it would be incredibly informative if there were a section that give a list of the winners during the award's history, linking the reader to the recipients' Wikipedia pages.

Semana 5
Article 1:

Hidden Away (film) : This article has almost no information and there is also not a Spanish version of the article which surprises me. Our class could definitely beef this up a little.

Article 2:

Mikel Rueda : Mikel has yet to have a page written about him. Maybe as a class we could provide him the gift of having an English and Spanish page written about him.

Hidden Away (film)
If I were to begin with this article I would pretty much be able to write the entire thing. There is almost no information about the film or the director.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt3289362/

http://www.aescondidaspelicula.com/sinopsis/

http://mikelrueda.com/

http://www.fotogramas.es/Peliculas/A-escondidas/Mikel-Rueda-La-homosexualidad-en-la-adolescencia-todavia-es-un-tema-tabu

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm6043142/

http://www.lavanguardia.com/gente/20140326/54404116987/adil-koukouh-policia-para-calle-marroqui.html

https://elpais.com/elpais/2015/06/26/estilo/1435317222_114424.html

Notas del Profesor
Hola, Weetoy3424! Be sure to revisit the Assignment for Week #3 and add the necessary header here, in your sandbox, as well as information on an article that you're evaluating. What is the article, and what are your thoughts on what it is missing? Danielbritain (talk) 20:55, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Hola Weetoy3424; great job with your first edits to the Victoria Abril page! Remember that when you're making changes to an article, it's good practice to leave notes on the Talk page letting other editors know what you've done and why -- as a way of leaving a visual log and letting others know of changes you've made beyond the "edit summary". This is particularly true for pages to which you will be doing big edits, so that others know you're working. Danielbritain (talk) 14:31, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Peer Review
Looks like a good start on research for the article, even with limited information. Maybe you can use some of the stuff from the interview we had with Rueda to bulk up the article a little more or maybe there are other interviews regarding the movie that were given at one point or another.