User:Weirdcactus472/Calico (video game)/Dancermia11 Peer Review

Yes, the lead introduces new content that the user would like to add, and it well describes the topic of the article. I think that your edits/contributions will be very beneficial to the original article. New relevant information is/is planned to be added, such as screenshots of the video game for a more realistic feel. I think this idea is great for conveying how the game really works. also, adding in more brand information regarding the brand Calico also seems very relevant and crucial for this type of article. The gameplay draft section currently is a bit confusing, so I would take time to reorganize and perhaps restructure some of those sentences fro some more clarity. Overall, this content is neutral and they are adding only up to date information. I also think the tone aligns with the tone of the article. Although they haven't yet inserted images, I think the screenshots if they are clear, labeled, and well captioned, will be a great and informational addition to the article. I think a few more sources might be necessary in order to have a really well-developed and back up argument. I would even recommend looking outside of soley the video game and including sources containing information on the brand, other games, etc.

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)