User:Weloveflowers/Catharine Beecher/Gpeterson54 Peer Review

Lead

- There is an introductory paragraph giving reference as to who Catherine Beecher was and what she has done in the past.

- The article gives a brief description of the major sections that will be focused on. Although, it gives only two. There are many more sections in the article that are not listed in the first paragraph such as legacy, midlife in the west, later life and death, etc.

- The lead is concise and includes all information that is present in the article.

Content

- The content is relevant and up to date

- The article does touch base on underrepresented populations/topics. The topic that it focused on is education with a more in depth voice on women in education and how Catherine Beecher advocated for women.

Tone and Balance

- The content added is neutral

Sources and References

- All new content is backed up by a reliable secondary source of information

- Content accurately reflects what the cited courses say

- Sources are current and written by a diverse spectrum of authors

Organization

- Paragraphs are well written and clear

- The content does have a few grammatical errors. There is an error in the first paragraph and there are a few errors with capitalization in some places.

- The content is well organized. The content related under views of advocacy of education and views of education is somewhat confusing. Combining these would be more clear.

Images and Media

- The content contains two images of Beecher as well as the man she was supposed to marry.

- Images are visually appealing and adhere to Wikipedias copyright regulations.

- Try to add one or two more pictures of one of her influential changes or a picture of one of her books and you can move the picture of Beecher to the top of the page.

Overall Impressions

- The article now, yes is more complete.

- The content added can be improved by fixing grammar errors. It can also be improved by giving more information. “Catherine Beecher was a strong advocate of the inclusion of daily physical education in women’s schooling” Why was she a strong advocate of this?

-This article is strong because there are many sources cited. The article makes you think that you really are reading a page off of Wikipedia. The article is well detailed.

forthright opinions on female education as well as her vehement support of the many benefits of the incorporation of kindergarten

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(We love flowers)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Weloveflowers/Catharine_Beecher?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)