User:Weloveflowers/Catharine Beecher/Igutierrez3 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Weloveflowers (Group 3 on Catherine Butcher)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Weloveflowers/Catharine_Beecher?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Catharine Beecher
 * Catharine Beecher

Evaluate the drafted changes
To begin, we can see that a majority of these edit are pretty straight forward and to the point for major sections which is a great plus to the content. There is not too much original content from the original article but the included information adds to it just nicely with fair inclusions. The inclusions are as up to date as you can expect with the content while staying related for the most part. More could be added on additional topics that could be explored deeper that were briefly mentioned inn the original article however. Overall, I can say that when reading that most of the perspectives were neutral with very little biased noticed. When exploring all the links, all of them seemed worked and seemed up to date enough to improve the currently published article. They reflect the article quite well with information relating to each major section. While reading, I can barely notice too many spelling errors for this draft besides some sentences seeming a little rushed to write and simple. Organization was easy to navigate and read. There are two images present in this article that remain relevant and show different portrayals of this influencer. Both were appropriately placed. In all, I can say that this article was pleasant to read and can be useful for the improvement of the current article that is published. Strengths that are present are the structure, simplicity, and relevancy of each of the sources. Weaknesses that can be improved come down to the needed information to beef up sentences that come off too simple or bland that is original to what is already published.