User:Wendylin0510/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Clinical physiology

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I have chosen the article about clinical physiology because the discipline is relevant in medical and nonmedical studies. Clinical physiology utilizes many specific testing methods to diagnose patients with underlying conditions. However, the knowledge is considered basic education for health professionals and radiologists. The type of discipline has shifted to become a subdiscipline that aims to merge clinical physiology into other fields of medical science, such as radiology I want to evaluate the article and bring attention to the significant role that they practice the specialty in a nonmedical setting.

Evaluate the article
The article is relevant to the topic of clinical physiology. It provides a clear description of the history and the specific roles in the field. The information is not out of date yet because the profession remained independent of radiology. I would recommend adding the challenges that the clinical physiologists might be facing in their career because such discipline is likely to merge as basic education for physicians. Another improvement is to make a distinction between clinical physiology and other medical fields. The importance to keep clinical physiology independent is the kind of viewpoint is underrepresented. The article is neutral, and I do not find any biased statement towards a particular position.