User:Wenhongchi/Christianity in the Middle Ages/Jackielupinblack Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Wenhongchi
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: Christianity in the Middle Ages

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? Yes
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Yes about the Crusades
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? Continues the section
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? Yes

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes
 * Is the content added up-to-date? Yes
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? No

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? Yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No it was rather informative and well balanced in keeping a neutral tone

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes, used three secondary sources
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes they do
 * Are the sources current? No, they're not recent
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes they work

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? No
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? No image was used
 * Are images well-captioned? No image was used
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? No image was used
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? No image was used

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject? No he didn't use any articles, only secondary sources
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject? yes
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles? Didn't use articles
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable? Didn't use articles

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? Yes
 * What are the strengths of the content added? Extending the crusades section
 * How can the content added be improved? N/A

Overall evaluation
The classmate that I was assigned to peer edited decided contribute more information onto the Crusades section. My partner did an excellent job in maintaining a neutral tone while not showing any form of bias instead provides a clear and thorough piece. The passage was straightforward, informative and eligible. My partner mainly used secondary sources, which was unique because the live page mainly had primary sources. My partner only using historical and academic books balances the usage of primary and secondary sources to the main page. The only issue is that he needs to fix some of his citations so when he moves his sandbox to the live page, it'll be more reliable for the readers. Overall, the passage was relevant to the main article and neatly organized.- Jackielupinblack