User:Wer900/Consensus study

On this page, I shall document the results of a study on consensus which is currently in progress. Each discussion shall have three parameters of (actual decision, "appropriate" decision, and systematic decision). The value for the last parameter shall be determined as per my essay WP:Consensus defined, and shall be determined after the other factors in order to ensure minimum bias and conflict of interest. Each parameter may have a value of "consensus affirmative", "consensus negative", or "no consensus". Following the collection of data, statistics will be derived as to how much improvement the proposed policy has created.

Data tables
Here all data collected from each page shall be visible, sorted by category of discussion. Please look at the discussion page itself for relevant background on it.

Articles for deletion
In this section, "consensus affirmative" shall be a discussion resulting in the deletion or merger of the page, "consensus negative" shall be defined as a discussion electing to keep the content on its own separate page, and "no consensus" where consensus is not the determinant of the ultimate action due to lack thereof, regardless what the future actions may be.

For every month of AfDs in a year, from March on back, 30 AfDs shall be selected, for a total of 360 for every year.