User:Werickson.31/Mahamat Déby/Potatofeets Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

werikson.31


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Werickson.31/Mahamat_D%C3%A9by?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead

- There seems to be no new inclusion of the lead. I believe the same one is being used but it is directed towards the rest of the content being provided

- The lead is an introduction to the rest of the content as it is the description of the individual. The lead does an amazing job of describing the rest of the structure as long as the added details which formulates a concise description of what the rest of the article will be about

- The lead does not discuss the major points of the rest of the article but it does a crucial role of introducing the individual although the rest of the article is mainly about the way this person became a key point. The rest of the article seems to move beyond the lead and discuss further details of the life of the individual with concise information.

Content

- The content being added is revelant to the rest of the article and seems to give further information on what was specifically being illustrated

- The content is up to date but there seems to be additional information that could be added

- There is no gaps in between as it goes back to previous years and mentions what has currently been occurring. The article is well structures although there may be a few more details that could be added and potentially be reexamined

Tone and Balance

- The content is neutral

- The content is not overly reliant on one sided and seems to gather information from different perspectives

Sources and References

- There could potentially be further citing

- mostly everything is being sources from a reliable page

- links work

- sources are pretty much current nothing before 2021

Organization

-The content written is well structured although more could be added

- it is concise but also has somewhat a plentiful of information

- The topics should be expanded further but other than that it good

- it would be great if images were to be added or current illustrations

Overall Impression

The page is well structured and has somewhat added a good amount of details from the previous page. The article could use a little bit more of additional topics and maybe a few images but that may be more of a personal preference. Although I enjoyed the content being added I also few that a growth could be the outlining of the topics with further information and maybe a revision of the lead to introduce the other information.This content was very well and I appreciate the bolding and excellent sourcing!