User:Westontengan1/Evaluate an Article

Ban Pako does speak in a neutral tone but is very vague about the history of the resort that lies near an “ancient temple”. The site itself is not described very well and did not give any background other than its geographical location. The article also does not expand on why these people had such pottery skills and what were they doing with these pots and skills. The two references on the page do work and are relevant to Ban Pako. Something that can be added can be the history of any of the people living in the area and the cultural and behavioral practices that they had in their societies. No information is provided about the use or purpose of the temple which is something worth researching further. During class, we argue single or multiple points while Wikipedia tries to give you a plethora of information that is unbiased and that means including all sides to a subject.

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)